The study was conducted in a riverine grassland along the river Taia/Jong, Njala university, Southern Sierra Leone. It was undertaken with the aim of investigating the performance of three submergence-tolerant rice varieties at different elevation zones in a Riverine grassland. The experimental design had two factors (three rice varieties and six elevation zones) arranged in a Randomized Complete Block Design (RCBD) in each of two blocks. The rice varieties were Indochine Blanc (Deepwater Floating Rice), FARO 66 and FARO 67 respectively. Yield responses to submergence depth were non-linear and variety?specific: FARO 66 and FARO 67 peaked at intermediate depths (76–143 cm), while Indochine Blanc shows a flatter, lower response with slight improvement under deep water. The study concluded that the strong variety?by?submergence interaction (p < 0.05) revealed that flooding did not act as a blanket constraint, but rather as a filter that distinguished genotypes by their tolerance capacity. While the FARO varieties generally performed best at 143 cm, these average trends were conditional on statistical context. For growers in flood?variable environments, the path to optimal yield lay in deliberately pairing water-depth management with the natural submergence?tolerance strengths of the chosen rice variety. FARO 66 is recommended for areas with stable shallow to medium flooding (up to 150 cm), while FARO 67 is preferable where water levels fluctuate frequently. Indochine Blanc is not suitable for commercial production under the tested conditions due to consistently low yields.
| Published in | International Journal of Applied Agricultural Sciences (Volume 12, Issue 5) |
| DOI | 10.11648/j.ijaas.20261205.12 |
| Page(s) | 181-192 |
| Creative Commons |
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited. |
| Copyright |
Copyright © The Author(s), 2026. Published by Science Publishing Group |
Submergence Variety, FARO 66, FARO 67, Deepwater Floating Rice
| [1] | Muthayya, S., Sugimoto, J. D., Montgomery, S., & Maberly, G. F. (2014). An overview of global rice production, supply, trade, and consumption. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, *1324*, 7–14. |
| [2] | Peden, D., Tadesse, G., & Misra, A. K. (2007). Water and livestock for human development. In Water for food, water for life: A comprehensive assessment of water in agriculture (pp. 485–514). International Water Management Institute. |
| [3] | Indian Council of Agricultural Research. (2006). Handbook of agriculture: Facts and figures for farmers, students, and all interested in farming (5th ed.). Directorate of Information and Publications of Agriculture. |
| [4] | Juliano, B. O. (1993). Rice in human nutrition (FAO Food and Nutrition Series No. 26). Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations; International Rice Research Institute. |
| [5] | Carcea, M. (2021). Value of Wholegrain Rice in a Healthy Human Nutrition. Agriculture, 11(8), 720. |
| [6] | Tsujimoto, Y., Rakotoson, T., Tanaka, A., & Saito, K. (2019). Challenges and opportunities for improving N use efficiency for rice production in sub-Saharan Africa. Plant Production Science, 22(4), 413–427. |
| [7] | Diagne, A., Alia, D. Y., Amovin-Assagba, E., Wopereis, M. C., Saito, K., & Nakelse, T. (2013). Farmer perceptions of the biophysical constraints to rice production in sub-Saharan Africa, and potential impact of research. In M. C. S. Wopereis et al. (Eds.), Realizing Africa’s rice promise (pp. 46–68). CABI. |
| [8] | Zenna, N., Manneh, B., Atnaf, M., & Worede, F. (2019). Molecular breeding and biotechnology for rice improvement in the developing world. In F. Taye, A. Mulugeta, A. Dawit, F. Milahun, & S. Kiyoshi (Eds.), Advances in rice research and development in Ethiopia (pp. 79–98). Ethiopian Institute of Agricultural Research. |
| [9] | Rodenburg, J., & Saito, K. (2022). Towards sustainable productivity enhancement of rice-based farming systems in sub-Saharan Africa. Field Crops Research, *287*, 108670. |
| [10] | Africa Rice Center. (2011). Africa Rice Center (AfricaRice) Annual Report 2011. |
| [11] | Kuya, N., Sun, J., Iijima, K., Venuprasad, R., & Yamamoto, T. (2019). Novel method for evaluation of anaerobic germination in rice and its application to diverse genetic collections. Breeding Science, 69(4), 633–639. |
| [12] | Catling, D. (1992). Rice in deep water. MacMillan Press. |
| [13] | Huke, R. E., & Huke, E. H. (1997). Rice area by types of culture: South and South-east Asia. International Rice Research Institute. |
| [14] | Bouman, B. A. M., Humphreys, E., Tuong, T. P., & Barker, R. (2007). Rice and water. Advances in Agronomy, *92*, 187–237. |
| [15] | Manzanilla, D. O., Janiya, J. D., & Johnson, D. E. (2013). Establishing community?based seed systems: A training manual. International Rice Research Institute; International Fund for Agricultural Development; Philippine Rice Research Institute. |
| [16] | Rashid-Noah, A. B., Johnny, M., Olapade, J., Phillips, M. J., & Siriwardena, S. N. (2018). Inland valley swamp assessment in Tonkolili District, Sierra Leone (Program Report 2018-01). WorldFish. |
| [17] | Blango, M. M., Cooke, R. A., & Moiwo, J. P. (2019). Effect of soil and water management practices on crop productivity in tropical inland valley swamps. Agricultural Water Management, 222, 82-91. |
| [18] | Singh, A., Singh, Y., Mahato, A. K., Jayaswal, P. K., Singh, S. P., Singh, R., Yadav, N., Singh, A. K., Singh, P., Singh, R., Kumar, R., Septiningsih, E. M., Balyan, H. S., Singh, N. K., & Rai, V. (2020). Allelic sequence variation in the Sub1A, Sub1B and Sub1C genes among diverse rice cultivars and its association with submergence tolerance. Scientific Reports, 10, Article 8621. |
| [19] | Basu, S., Kumari, S., & Kumar, G. (2024). Sub1 QTL confers submergence tolerance in rice through nitro-oxidative regulation and phytohormonal signaling. Plant Physiology and Biochemistry, *211*, 108682. |
| [20] | Kende, H., van der Knaap, E., & Cho, H. T. (1998). Deepwater rice: A model plant to study stem elongation. Plant Physiology, 118(4), 1105–1110. |
| [21] | Dumaresq, D., van Nguyen, K., Pittock, J., Oo, M., Sok, K., van Hieu, T., & Blessington, L. (2020). The paradoxical values of traditional deep water floating rice systems. Global Food Security, *26*, 100391 |
| [22] | Saito, K., Senthilkumar, K., Dossou-Yovo, E. R., Ali, I., Johnson, J. M., Mujawamariya, G., & Rodenburg, J. (2023). Status quo and challenges of rice production in sub-Saharan Africa. Plant Production Science, 26(3), 320–333. |
| [23] | Mwakyusa, L., Dixit, S., Herzog, M., Heredia, M. C., Madege, R. R., & Kilasi, N. L. (2023). Flood-tolerant rice for enhanced production and livelihood of smallholder farmers of Africa. Frontiers in Sustainable Food Systems, *7*, 1244460. |
| [24] | Ines, R. L., Thazon, J. P. B., & Daag, M. N. (2018). Utilization of small farm reservoir (SFR) for upland agriculture of Bataan, Philippines. International Journal of Applied Agricultural Science, *4*(1), 1–6. |
APA Style
Yambasu, N., Cooke, R. A., Blango, M. M., Bah, A. M. (2026). The Performance of Three Submergence-Tolerant Rice Varieties at Different Agro-ecological Submergence Zones in a Riverine Grassland. International Journal of Applied Agricultural Sciences, 12(5), 181-192. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijaas.20261205.12
ACS Style
Yambasu, N.; Cooke, R. A.; Blango, M. M.; Bah, A. M. The Performance of Three Submergence-Tolerant Rice Varieties at Different Agro-ecological Submergence Zones in a Riverine Grassland. Int. J. Appl. Agric. Sci. 2026, 12(5), 181-192. doi: 10.11648/j.ijaas.20261205.12
AMA Style
Yambasu N, Cooke RA, Blango MM, Bah AM. The Performance of Three Submergence-Tolerant Rice Varieties at Different Agro-ecological Submergence Zones in a Riverine Grassland. Int J Appl Agric Sci. 2026;12(5):181-192. doi: 10.11648/j.ijaas.20261205.12
@article{10.11648/j.ijaas.20261205.12,
author = {Navo Yambasu and Richard Andrew Cooke and Mohamed Matthew Blango and Alieu Mohamed Bah},
title = {The Performance of Three Submergence-Tolerant Rice Varieties at Different Agro-ecological Submergence Zones in a Riverine Grassland},
journal = {International Journal of Applied Agricultural Sciences},
volume = {12},
number = {5},
pages = {181-192},
doi = {10.11648/j.ijaas.20261205.12},
url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijaas.20261205.12},
eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.ijaas.20261205.12},
abstract = {The study was conducted in a riverine grassland along the river Taia/Jong, Njala university, Southern Sierra Leone. It was undertaken with the aim of investigating the performance of three submergence-tolerant rice varieties at different elevation zones in a Riverine grassland. The experimental design had two factors (three rice varieties and six elevation zones) arranged in a Randomized Complete Block Design (RCBD) in each of two blocks. The rice varieties were Indochine Blanc (Deepwater Floating Rice), FARO 66 and FARO 67 respectively. Yield responses to submergence depth were non-linear and variety?specific: FARO 66 and FARO 67 peaked at intermediate depths (76–143 cm), while Indochine Blanc shows a flatter, lower response with slight improvement under deep water. The study concluded that the strong variety?by?submergence interaction (p < 0.05) revealed that flooding did not act as a blanket constraint, but rather as a filter that distinguished genotypes by their tolerance capacity. While the FARO varieties generally performed best at 143 cm, these average trends were conditional on statistical context. For growers in flood?variable environments, the path to optimal yield lay in deliberately pairing water-depth management with the natural submergence?tolerance strengths of the chosen rice variety. FARO 66 is recommended for areas with stable shallow to medium flooding (up to 150 cm), while FARO 67 is preferable where water levels fluctuate frequently. Indochine Blanc is not suitable for commercial production under the tested conditions due to consistently low yields.},
year = {2026}
}
TY - JOUR T1 - The Performance of Three Submergence-Tolerant Rice Varieties at Different Agro-ecological Submergence Zones in a Riverine Grassland AU - Navo Yambasu AU - Richard Andrew Cooke AU - Mohamed Matthew Blango AU - Alieu Mohamed Bah Y1 - 2026/09/20 PY - 2026 N1 - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijaas.20261205.12 DO - 10.11648/j.ijaas.20261205.12 T2 - International Journal of Applied Agricultural Sciences JF - International Journal of Applied Agricultural Sciences JO - International Journal of Applied Agricultural Sciences SP - 181 EP - 192 PB - Science Publishing Group SN - 2469-7885 UR - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijaas.20261205.12 AB - The study was conducted in a riverine grassland along the river Taia/Jong, Njala university, Southern Sierra Leone. It was undertaken with the aim of investigating the performance of three submergence-tolerant rice varieties at different elevation zones in a Riverine grassland. The experimental design had two factors (three rice varieties and six elevation zones) arranged in a Randomized Complete Block Design (RCBD) in each of two blocks. The rice varieties were Indochine Blanc (Deepwater Floating Rice), FARO 66 and FARO 67 respectively. Yield responses to submergence depth were non-linear and variety?specific: FARO 66 and FARO 67 peaked at intermediate depths (76–143 cm), while Indochine Blanc shows a flatter, lower response with slight improvement under deep water. The study concluded that the strong variety?by?submergence interaction (p < 0.05) revealed that flooding did not act as a blanket constraint, but rather as a filter that distinguished genotypes by their tolerance capacity. While the FARO varieties generally performed best at 143 cm, these average trends were conditional on statistical context. For growers in flood?variable environments, the path to optimal yield lay in deliberately pairing water-depth management with the natural submergence?tolerance strengths of the chosen rice variety. FARO 66 is recommended for areas with stable shallow to medium flooding (up to 150 cm), while FARO 67 is preferable where water levels fluctuate frequently. Indochine Blanc is not suitable for commercial production under the tested conditions due to consistently low yields. VL - 12 IS - 5 ER -